Thesis + Reader Response #2

The CFM56 series is a collection of high-bypass turbofan aircraft engines manufactured by CFM International (Global Engine Maintenance, 2019), a 50-50 collaboration between GE Aerospace and Safran Aircraft Engines (MTU Aero Engine, n.d). Supplying more than 30,000 units to about 500 clients globally, it is the most dominant engine used on aircraft (CFM International, 2017, as cited by Mwanalushi, 2021). Among the series, the CFM56-7 is the latest engine developed (CFM International, 1995). According to CFM International (2024), it is the sole engine “for the Boeing Next-Generation single-aisle airliner”, with over 15,000 CFM56-7 produced to power Boeing-737 aircraft, earning its title as “the most popular engine-aircraft combination in commercial aviation history”. In addition, the engine has accumulated 25 million flight hours in just six years of commercial operations, setting yet another record for having “the fastest accumulation of flight hours in commercial aviation history” (CFM International, 2024). The CFM56-7 features a “three-dimensional aero design, a high-efficiency wide chord fan, advanced electronic engine control, and active clearance control systems”, offering substantial cost advantages from a significant cutback in fuel consumption and maintenance expenses (CFM International, 1997).

The CFM56-7’s notable achievement is well-deserved, thanks to its merits in efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Firstly, the CFM56-7’s specific fuel consumption is estimated to be 8 percent less than the CFM56-3 (CFM International, 1996). OpenAI (2024) described specific fuel consumption as the “amount of fuel consumed by the engine for producing a certain amount of thrust or power over a specific period”. Each percent reduction in fuel consumption can yield annual savings of as much as $15,000 per aircraft (CFM International, 1996). With that, it can be inferred that the CFM56-7 is more economical than its predecessor.

In addition, it was reported in 1996 by CFM International that the maintenance cost for the CFM56-7 is expected to be 15 percent lower than the CFM56-3 at the same thrust. An article by Aircraft Commerce (2003) states that a “performance restoration” for the CFM56-7 is estimated between $875,000 and $900,000 while a complete overhaul costs about $1.1 to $1.2 million. On the other hand, the “performance restoration” on CFM56-3 costs from $860,000 to $910,000, and the overhaul costs $1.4 to $1.5 million (Aircraft Commerce, 2006). It is evident that conducting maintenance on the CFM56-7 is much cheaper than the CFM56-3.

Despite its edge over its earlier version, the CFM56-7 has shortcomings when compared to its successor, the LEAP-1B, which is developed with an identical design to the CFM56 series (Memon, 2023) by CFM International (GE Aerospace, n.d). In terms of thrust performance, the LEAP-1B can produce 23,000 to 28,000 pounds of thrust (Memon & Walker, 2024) while the CFM56-7 can only produce 18,500 to 26,300 pounds of thrust (CFM International, 1996). Since “in level flight, when thrust is increased, the aircraft speeds up and the lift increases” (Federal Aviation Administration, n.d), the LEAP engine will provide better velocity and lift in the same conditions than the CFM56-7.

The bypass ratio is another aspect in which the LEAP-1B surpassed the CFM56-7.  The LEAP-1B engine has an outstanding bypass ratio of 9:1 (Memon & Walker, 2024) while the bypass ratio of the CFM56-7 lowest-thrust-rated version is 5:1 (Aircraft-Commerce, 2008). An article by Monroe Aerospace (2023) states that “high-bypass turbofans are typically more efficient than their low-bypass counterparts” as they utilize less fuel and produce lower amounts of gas emissions. Having said that, we can say that the LEAP-1B is more fuel-efficient while producing significantly lesser discharge than its older counterpart.

In conclusion, the CFM-56 engine series is well-received in the aviation industry and has significantly contributed to the aerospace industry with its performance. As technology advances, it has become the foundation for improvement for the LEAP series. 

References

Aircraft Commerce. (2008). Aircraft-Commerce. https://www.aircraft-commerce.com/wp-content/uploads/aircraft-commerce-docs/Aircraft%20guides/CFM56-7B/ISSUE58_CFM56_7B_SPECS.pdf

Aircraft Commerce. (2023). Maintenance cost analysis: JT8D-200, CFM56-5B/-7 & V.2500. https://www.aircraft-commerce.com/wp-content/uploads/aircraft-commerce-docs1/Maintenance/2003/ISSUE%2028-MTCE-B.pdf

Aircraft Commerce. (2006). CFM56-3 maintenance analysis & budget. https://www.aircraft-commerce.com/sample_article_folder/maintenance_engineering_1_sample.pdf

CFM International. (1995, May 22). CFM56 engines continue to lead the industry; new CFM56-7 begins ground testing on schedule. https://www.cfmaeroengines.com/press-articles/cfm56-engines-continue-to-lead-the-industry-new-cfm56-7-begins-ground-testing-on-schedule/

CFM International. (2024, April 9). CFM56 - CFM international jet engines. https://www.cfmaeroengines.com/engines/cfm56/

CFM International. (1997, October 14). Thy places $280 million CFM56-7 order. https://www.cfmaeroengines.com/press-articles/thy-places-280-million-cfm56-7-order/

CFM International. (1996, December 7). CFM56-7: An in-depth look at the new industry leader. https://www.cfmaeroengines.com/press-articles/cfm56-7-an-in-depth-look-at-the-new-industry-leader/

CFM International. (2024, February 24). CFM56-7B fleet achieves 25 million engine flight hours. https://www.cfmaeroengines.com/press-articles/cfm56-7b-fleet-achieves-25-million-engine-flight-hours/

Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.). Chapter 5 - Aerodynamics of Flight. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/07_phak_ch5_0.pdf

GE Aerospace. (n.d.). CFM LEAPEngine family. https://www.geaerospace.com/commercial/aircraft-engines/cfm-leap

Global Engine Maintenance. (2019, July 27).  CFM56-7B. https://global-engine.com/cfm56-7b/

Memon, Dr. O. (2023, February 24). The engine of the future: How does the CFM leap differ from the CFM-56?. Simple Flying. https://simpleflying.com/cfm-leap-engine-advantages/

Memon, Dr. O., & Walker, S. (2024, September 6). How CFM LEAP engines enhance the performance of the Boeing 737 MAX. Simple Flying. https://simpleflying.com/cfm-leap-engines-enhance-performace-boeing-737-max/

Monroe Aerospace. (2023, December 1). Low vs high bypass turbofan engines: What’s the difference? One Monroe Aerospace. https://monroeaerospace.com/blog/low-vs-high-bypass-turbofan-engines-whats-the-difference/?srsltid=AfmBOop4ZGcr6mZWW-cdLG1awlbSfKTi7qs2SL1JhmxJk_VVpLrinqqk

MTU Aero Engines. (n.d.). CFM56: Powering the Airbus A320 family and the Boeing 737. https://www.mtu.de/engines/commercial-aircraft-engines/narrowbody-and-regional-jets/cfm56-2/-5b/-7/

Mwanalushi, K. (2021, March 29). Turning turbines: Why CFM56 is the reigning engine of choice. Aviation Business News. https://www.aviationbusinessnews.com/low-cost/cfm56-aviation-aircraft-engine/

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

About myself

Subject: Self-introduction (Critical Thinking and Communications) Dear Professor Blackstone, I am Albert, a student from class S20, attending one of the Critical Thinking and Communications modules you teach. I am writing to introduce myself. I graduated from Ngee Ann Polytechnic with a diploma in aerospace engineering in 2022. My interest in engineering came from my father, who works as a mechanic. Growing up, I watched him work on cars and was fascinated by how simple inanimate objects enabled complex mechanisms to function. Among the various engineering industries, aerospace piqued my interest the most as I was intrigued by the idea of flying. As such, I decided to pursue my studies in the aerospace field. I believe my communication strength is my ability to understand my audience, a skill I acquired during my national service. I served as a policeman and had to frequently converse with both my team and the public. To ensure everyone could understand me, I would converse or explain
Read more

Summary Draft 1 + Thesis

The CFM56 series is a collection of high-bypass turbofan aircraft engines manufactured by CFM International (Global Engine Maintenance, 2019). Supplying more than 30,000 units to about 500 clients globally, it is the most dominant engine used in airliner (CFM International, 2017, as cited by Mwanalushi, 2021). In addition, its capability to produce thrust 18,500 to 33,000 pounds of thrust has made it a benchmark in the engine market (Safran group, n.d). This feat was due to its exceptional efficiency and dependability (Safran group, n.d), which was made possible by the 50-50 collaboration between GE Aerospace and Safran Aircraft Engines (MTU Aero Engine, n.d). According to GE Aerospace (2017), the CFM56-7 among the series, has an "industry-leading 99.96 percent engine dispatch reliability rate", implying that only one flight take-off in 2,500 has been held up or called off. In a nutshell, the CFM56 engine series took over the industry with its consistency in its extraordinary
Read more

Quote Intepretation by Xuan Yi and me

“Without clear lines of communication, our ideas would stay within our own small development teams instead of becoming mature products. While this is obvious to those of us who have become experienced engineers, the real question is: Why is it lost to us when we are engineering students?” - Akbar R Khan, Software Systems Engineer, USA, “Good Communication Is Essential...” (2014) The above quote emphasizes the importance of communication in turning ideas into reality. It implies that clear communication is critical for disseminating and developing ideas beyond small, isolated groups. While experienced engineers recognize this requirement, the remark raises the issue of why this awareness is absent among engineering students. Engineering students may not completely recognize how important communication is in the product development process, likely because they are typically focused on technical skills and may not yet understand how teamwork and transparent information sharing generate cr
Read more